Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1267763237 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete?
Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 8:27 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


gewg wrote:
||with portable devices becoming a huge factor,
||least-common-denominator pagefeeds are becoming ever more important.
||(Some sites have separate pages specifically for phones/handhelds.)
||
Arminius wrote:
|Yeah ok. I see your point.
|
I don't think so.  More below.

|I don't even bother carrying a cell phone.
|
Nor do I.  I have sworn off corporations with outrageous business models
and the cartels can eat my shorts.

|To people who line up all night to be among the first to get the latest iPhone
|I can see where this would be important.
|
You missed my point.
These pages don't check to see if you are actually using a handheld.
If all you need is text, you can access these pages with ANY hardware/software.
The pagefeed you get has fewer (no?) graphics and fewer (no?) scripts.
Click anything here for an example:
http://google.com/search?q=site:slashdot.org/palm

An even better trick that I use is to call up the Google Cache of a page
and append &strip=1 to the URL.
If you've clicked a significant number of my links,
you've probably noticed that there are a lot of pages that load really fast
and contain nothing but text.

There can be a latency problem.
Google doesn't put up a Cached link until 24 hours after the page is published,
so you can't use this with e.g. breaking news.
...and sometimes the Cached links are just plain broken.  8-(

||fanboy
||
|There is plenty I grumble about when it comes to MS[...]
|When MS ends support for a product
|they should be required BY LAW to release a service pack
|which includes all the fixes that were released since the previous service pack
|
Dreamer.  M$ (like all megacorps) is beyond the law (at least in the USA). 
I expect them to get pounded in the EU for their "random" browser choice screen.
Of course, they could glom onto their usual escape tactic:
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence."




Written in response to:
re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (Arminius: Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 4:51 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Wed, Mar 3, 2010, 4:00 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (Arminius: Wed, Mar 3, 2010, 6:56 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Wed, Mar 3, 2010, 8:44 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (Arminius: Thu, Mar 4, 2010, 1:56 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Thu, Mar 4, 2010, 3:59 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (Arminius: Thu, Mar 4, 2010, 4:51 pm)
*re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Thu, Mar 4, 2010, 8:27 pm)
*re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Sat, Mar 20, 2010, 1:22 pm)
*re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Fri, Mar 26, 2010, 3:04 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Tue, Mar 30, 2010, 8:22 pm)
-re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (Arminius: Tue, Mar 30, 2010, 9:00 pm)
*re: Still think your browser isn't obsolete? (gewg_: Tue, Mar 30, 2010, 11:40 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.